A house of cards

Yesterday, between 17h35 and 17h45 on Queen intersection, SW, wearing black skirt and jacket carrying moderately large full possibly leather handbag, greying black hair, wider set face, evenly spaced freckles covering face about 2cm average separation, female.

“We thought we’d convinced you”

I received a Judgement (Statement of Claim, Letter to defense counsel, Physics Head of Department, Mathematics Head of Department, Physics Head of Department) today in my case against the University of Auckland. I am disappointed that the word of an inferior can outweigh the actions of a stalwart.

Shortly thereafter, and just before a threat to my life emanated from the High Court, the lip-popping blonde walked past me down to Beach Road while I was on the park bench across from the High Court.  He said, “and another one was that you weren’t in Joy Division.” That is correct, I never claimed such.  There is, however, a story about a wife, a cousin, and a half-sister.

Shortly after four, from the seats beside the piano at Forde’s bar, “you’re the guy from St. Albans.”

Maybe this withdrawn Statement of Fact from an appeal and this letter (Response from Ombudsman, letter to Security Intelligence Service, letter to Ombudsman, letter to then Minister responsible for Security Intelligence Service, letter from Private Personal Secretary, Alec McLean, letter to Barrister), from the Office of the Prime Minister are of interest.

[Addendum 21h43 18 02 2009]

Note that to file for a strike-out, as quoted in the decision, the applicant accepts that the substance of the case is true. The Statement of Fact points a general matter, tortfeasance resulting from a breach of the Privacy Act, and, as amended, included a couple of specific points to demonstrate particular and essential breaches. While the people were not denoted by proper nouns, I did not want to prejudice the case, they are referred to uniquely and are essential and particular. The High Court has the capacity to refer to intelligence that the man on the street does not, such as the electronic equipment in a quantum physics lecture, as demonstrated in a later lecture by the lecturer. I also set out the names of most of the people involved, the time period, and referred to letters and emails. The judge had already indicated that he agreed that such a Statement is not to replace a trial.

The main building of the University is a building of Oamaru stone. A medium my great-great-great uncle James Lambert was the first to use. The clocktower was dedicated by one of the Knights of the Thistle, the Order of Scotland. To be Scottish is to be true to the spirit, something that University now is not.

[Addendum 16h45 20 May 2009]

Earlier today I went to the High Court to discuss the above case with the case flow manager, Peter Gayaman. Apparently the decision hinged on the fact that they claimed that I had not written the article The phase of a broadband signal is the phase of the sinusoidal components under consideration for Cognitive Neurodynamics. As a result, my oral pleading in the interlocutory strike out application was ignored. While I was discussing the matter with Gayaman an employee walked through the office area and said,

“He’s not Nick Pavitte.”

Upon my later return it appeared that my failure to yell out some sort of interjection had provided the indication that I had not in fact written the article and that I was the father of some bastard Vivian conceived October 22/23 2000 at the Sound Shell at the Botanic Gardens by ‘Nick Pavitte,’ a mossad agent, and Demarnia Lloyd, a german nazi.

Interesting, as there original false belief must have arisen from intelligence information, yet Vodafone and the GCSB/SIS can verify from my keystrokes that I wrote the article while I was living at The Federal. They might even try to claim that since my address has changed I am lying. Interesting, should I bother the editor with an address change? That does not affect the scientific content.

I returned with a new Statement of Claim as Gayaman had pointed out by email that an email submission of a new claim was not acceptable. The registrar, Tony, showed me the file and showed me that it was closed, he also then backed away, saying “Then you’re not that guy.”. I pointed out that the decision of Judge Faire dismissed the Statement of Claim but not the Notice of Proceeding. He said that was not the case. I returned to show him the quoted High Court Rule 15.1(2) that said that the proceeding could could be dismissed and the final decision in the judgement (see above) that failed to invoke 15.1(2).

He then started to say something about appealing the office worker’s decision not to accept the statement of claim, at which point I asserted that I had written the Cognitive Neurodynamics article. Tony said “Oh my God.” I responded, “Oh well, I didn’t kill Leonard Manning, because that is what this was, a clase.”

Another example of calumny and traducement. There are bolsheviks and nazis in New Zealand attempting to tarnish my character and blame me for various crimes and treasons committed by Helen Clark, Alexander Robert McLean, and psycho killers in a false Diplomatic Protection Squad in and around the New Zealand Police.

[Addendum 25 05 2009]

The email correspondence from the middle of March. A few days after my original complaint to the course coordinator, on the 17th of March, the Mental Health Service was contacted and told that I was acting strangely.

Course coordinator,, response,, Faculty of Science, and Vice-Chancellor’s Office.

I was in the United States from 28 June until 3 August. While overseas I was trespassed with a vague, non-specific reason. A letter requesting clarification.